The Gazette 1971
Society of Young Solicitors Solicitors Golfing Society Special Awards 1971
51, 137
Legal Remuneration—Central Costs Committee proposed External Control by broad-based Committee Company Formation Service Amalgamation and Partnership Service Precedent Bank and Engrossment Service Publications aided by Arthur Cox Foundation European Economic Community Increase in Solicitor's Remuneration Evidence before Insurance Commission Professional Liability Insurance Scheme
33 33 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 35 35 35 35 36 36>
Solicitors Apprentices Debating Society Reception
156 106 179
Statutory Instruments Agriculture, Lands and Fisheries Commodities, Goods and Services Conditions of Employment Control of Exports and Imports County and Town Management Finance and Central Government Harbours and Hydro-Electric Works Justice, Defence and External Affairs Customs and Excise Health Parking Temporary Rules Speed Limits Regulations Transport and Traffic Traffic and Parking Bye-Laws Traffic and Parking Temporary Rules Traffic Temporary Rules Miscellaneous Post Office Parking Bye-Laws
121 121 121 121 121 121 121 122 12 122 122 122 122 122 123 122 122 122 123 102 106 121 121 157
The Gazette Legal Education Ormrod Report
Objectives of Academic and Professional Stages ...
Signposts for the Future Law as a System of Values
Insurance Companies—Amount of Contribution towards legal expenses of insured King's Hospital—Escalating building costs Our Law System and E.E.C.—(D. O'Malley) One Hundred Years Ago The Kings Inns Commission of inquiry Society of Attorneys and Solicitors Presentation of Certificates (May)—The Role of the Lawyer President's Address to New Solicitors (December) ... Meticulous and Conscientious dedication Law the guardian of justice and liberty Professional fees for proceedings arising out of acci- dents—minimum fixed at £10.50 Prices and Incomes Board Report—Solicitors Profits of Conveyancing Excessive The rule of law The quest of justice Obituary—Richard Atkinson Paralysed Youth awarded £27,000 Practice Note—Third Party Procedure
36
37 161 61 102 192 107 26
Courts (Supplemental Provisions) Act 1961 (Sec- tion 46) Order 1961 increasing remuneration of Judges Rules o fthe Superior Courts (No. 2) 1971—re Appeals under Redundancy Payments Act 1967 Solicitors Act 1954 (Apprenticeship and Education) (Amendment) Regulations 1971 Rules of the Superior Courts (No. 2) 1971—re increase in costs of shorthand writers Third Judge not to sit in Waterford Court U.S. Supreme Court Ruling—blow to school children segregation Undertakings by solicitors to Banks—Personal respon- sibility of solicitors Solicitors Accounts (Amendment) Regulations 1971 This is your Business U.C.D. Legal Advice Centre
68 69 69 69 69
177
115 16 180 107
76 14
)
103
Professional Liability Insurance Rating of rents receivable by charity
53
The Register Registration of Title Acts
27, 65, 108, 138, 166, 195
137 198 160
Unqualified Practitioner Waterford Law Society
Regan, Mr. John (Mallow) struck off the Rolls Scarman Tribunal may cost £400,000
138 89
Attorney General Solicitors: conveyancing in contravention of section 20 of the Solicitors Act 1957: undertaking given in terms of injunction sought. Ch D— Pennycuick VC , 18th November 1971. The settlement was announced in an action between H M Attorney General at the relation of The Law Society and Sydney George Carter of Kenton Lane, Kenton, Middlesex. Sir Joseph Molony, QC , mention- ing the settlement to Pennycuick VC , said that The Law Society's claim was founded on s 20 of the Solici- tors Act 1957. Mr. Carter was and had been the secre- tary of an unincorporated body, the National House Owners' Society, which existed for providing con- veyancing services at a cheap rate. Mr. Carter had been convicted twice for contravening s 20 but The Law Society claimed that in spite of that he con- tinued conveyancing unlawfully. The writ in the present action was issued on 15 October 1968. The relief sought was an injunction to restrain Mr. Carter from continuing the breach of the law. Mr. Carter had offered an undertaiing in the terms of the relief claimed in the writ and the minutes of order had been pre-
v. Carter pared in the following terms: that Mr. Carter would not contravene or attempt to contravene s 20 by (a) drawing or preparing any instrument of transfer or charge for the purposes of the Land Registration Act 1925 or any other instrument (as defined in the section) relating to real or personal estate for or in expectation of any fee, gain or reward otherwise than by the agency of a person who was for the time being a qualified or excepted person for the purposes of the section; (b) causing or procuring the drawing or pre- paration of any such instrument as aforesaid otherwise than as aforesaid; and (c) holding out himself or other persons (except persons who were qualified or exempted persons for the purposes of the section) as being willing or entitled to draw or prepare any such instruments as aforesaid. Mr. Anthony Lester, for Mr. Carter, concurred and added that at no time since October 1967 had Mr. Carter been in breach of the provisions of s 20. Mr. Carter had been influenced to give the undertakings by the fact that even a defendant in a relator action was not a candidate under the Legal Aid and Advice Act 1949.
198
Made with FlippingBook