The Gazette 1961 - 64

annexed hereto, for the issue of Certificates of Title in substitution for the original Certificates issued in respect of the lands specified in the said Schedule, which original Certificates, it is alleged, have been lost or inadvertently destroyed. A new Certificate will be issued in each case, except a case in respect of which notification is received in this Registry within 28 days from the publication of this notice, that the Certificate of Title is still in existence, and in the custody of some person other than the registered owner. Any such notification should state the grounds on which such Certificate is being held. Dated the 29th day of February, 1964. SCHEDULE. 1. Registered Owner Martin Ryan. Folio number 9843. County Tipperary. Lands of Boolatin in the Barony of Owney and Arra containing 15 za. 2r. 3 5p. 2. Registered Owner Robert Scanlon and Johanna Mary Scanlon. Folio number 4407. County Wexford. Lands of Brandane in the Barony of Bargy con taining 2a. 3r. 5p. 3. Registered Owner Patrick Kilcullen. Folio number 9294. County Mayo. Lands of Dooyeaghny or Cloonloughan in the Barony of Tireragh con taining 88a. 3r. i6p. 4. Registered Owner Patrick McLoughlin. Folio number 5 5 9. County Leitrim. Lands of Cloonmeone Lower in the Barony of Drumahaire containing 6oa. or. lop. 5. Registered Owner Mary Flood. Folio number 2775. County Longford. Lands of Mullinroe con taining I2a. 3r. i op. and Lands of Culleenmore containing oa. 3r. 6p. both situate in the Barony of Granard. THE REGISTRY REGISTER B UNIVERSITY graduate, honours LL.B. wishes employment in solicitor's office, Dublin. Highly recommended and hard working. Replies to Box number 8.273. D. L. McALLISTER, Registrar of Titles Central Office, Land Registry, Chancery Street, DUBLIN.

belonged. He became dissatisfied with the conduct of the Union and resigned from it. The Union anxious to preserve the position that no non-member should be employed in that office took energetic steps to get the appellant to re-join, but he refused. As a result of steps taken by the Union and its members (including a threat by the respondents to break their own contracts of service with B.O.A.C. unless B.O.A.C. terminated the appellants' contract), B.O.A.C. were induced, first to suspend the appellant, and then to terminate his employment after giving him due notice. The appellant had no remedy against B.O.A.C. as it neither broke a contract with him, nor committed any tort against him. The House of Lords decided that the threat by the respondents in the employment of B.O.A.C. to break their own contracts, although admittedly in furtherance of a trade dispute, was an unlawful means which deprived the respondents of the protection of sections i and 3 of the Trade Disputes Act 1906. The decision in Cooper v. Millea and Others (1938. 1.11.749) and Riordan v. Butler (i94o.I.R.347) were applied Rookes v. Barnard (1964) i All. E.R.367). COMMISSIONERS' FEES The attention of members is drawn to S.I. Nos. 38 of 1964 relative to the above which may be pur chased from the Government Stationery Office, price <5d. These Rules make a number of amendments of a miscellaneous nature in the Rules of the Superior Courts (S.I. No. 72 of 1962) and, in particular, prescribe the fees payable to Commissioners for Oaths. FEES PAYABLE TO COMMISSIONERS FOR OATHS £ s . d. 1. On taking an affidavit, affirmation or declaration ... ... ... 50

2. On marking exhibits therein refer red to and required to be marked— for each exhibit but not exceeding for all exhibits ...

2 i 10

o o

REGISTRATION ACTS, 1891 AND 1942 ISSUE OF NEW LAND CERTIFICATE Applications have been received from the registered owners mentioned in the Schedule OF TITLE